Sat. Jul 2nd, 2022


Getty Images/iStockphoto

A small group of Senate Republicans and Democrats has reportedly reached a $1 trillion infrastructure deal. Meantime, the


Environmental Protection Agency has announced plans to redo the Trump Administration’s Waters of the U.S. (Wotus) rule, which will make it harder to build infrastructure.

The EPA this week announced plans to revise the


Wotus rule “to better protect our nation’s vital water resources that support public health, environmental protection, agricultural activity, and economic growth.” Translation: The EPA is preparing a private land grab that will limit farming, fracking, home building and economic activity.

Recall how the


-era Wotus rule expanded federal jurisdiction over “waters of the U.S.” under the 1972 Clean Water Act, which authorized the feds to regulate “navigable waterways” like the Hudson River. The Obama EPA claimed jurisdiction over any waterways with a “significant nexus” to “waters of the U.S.”

This included all land within a 100-year floodplain and 1,500 feet of the high-water mark or 4,000 feet of waters already under its jurisdiction, as well as “ephemeral” ponds, ditches and creeks that occasionally filled with storm runoff. The rule was intended to give the feds a veto over fossil-fuel development on private land.

But it also meant that farmers would have to get permits to fill ditches. Road and highway construction projects would need to undergo federal review if their storm runoff could affect waterways a mile or so away. The Trump EPA sensibly revised the rule to exclude unnavigable bodies of waters, including those that fill with water after a rainfall.

Now the Biden EPA complains the Trump regulatory rollback constrained its regulatory power too much, particularly in arid states like New Mexico and Arizona, and eliminated federal permitting requirements for 333 projects. Ergo, the agency plans to launch another amphibious assault on private land.

To recap: President Biden wants Congress to shovel out hundreds of billions of dollars for infrastructure, which the EPA then will tie up in a permitting morass—unless, of course, the projects advance climate or social-justice goals. Republicans shouldn’t agree to any infrastructure deal that doesn’t include permitting and regulatory efficiencies.

Main Street (04/13/21): Pete Buttigieg’s definition of infrastructure is not what the American people think it means. Images: Bloomberg/AP/Getty Images Composite: Mark Kelly

Copyright ©2020 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Appeared in the June 12, 2021, print edition.

By rahul